AWS S3 vs Cloudflare R2: Budget & Performance Comparison

September 11, 2025
2 min read
AWS S3 vs Cloudflare R2: Budget & Performance Comparison

Understanding the Core Offerings

  • Amazon S3: Scalable, durable, secure object storage with multiple storage classes. Deeply integrated with AWS ecosystem.
  • Cloudflare R2: S3-compatible storage with zero egress fees. Uses Cloudflare's global network for fast access and predictable pricing.

Performance: Speed & Latency

AWS S3

  • Pros: Fast within AWS, multiple regions for low latency, highly scalable.
  • Cons: Global latency can vary; performance depends on proximity to S3 region.

Cloudflare R2

  • Pros: Low latency for global users, fast content delivery via Cloudflare's edge network.
  • Cons: Still maturing; raw throughput may vary for non-CDN scenarios.

Verdict: For global audiences, Cloudflare R2 often delivers lower latency. AWS S3 excels within AWS, especially with CloudFront CDN.

Budget: Cost Comparison

AWS S3

  • Storage: Varies by class; generally competitive.
  • Requests: Small per-request charges.
  • Egress: Major cost driver; can be expensive for high-traffic or large files.
  • Pros: Flexible storage options, good for long-term archiving.
  • Cons: Egress fees can be unpredictable and high.

Cloudflare R2

  • Storage: Competitive per-GB pricing.
  • Requests: Small per-request charges.
  • Egress: Zero fees, huge cost advantage for public-facing data.
  • Pros: Predictable costs, ideal for high-egress use cases.
  • Cons: For very low-egress apps, S3 deep archive may be cheaper.

Budget Verdict: Cloudflare R2 is better for apps with high internet data transfer. S3 is still cost-effective for minimal egress or internal AWS use.

Use Cases

AWS S3

  • Core storage for AWS apps (EC2, Lambda, EKS)
  • Data lakes & analytics
  • Backup & disaster recovery
  • Long-term archiving with Glacier
  • Complex data management

Cloudflare R2

  • Static asset delivery (websites, images, CSS/JS)
  • Video/audio streaming globally
  • User-generated content storage
  • APIs with large payloads for distributed clients
  • Multi-cloud S3-compatible storage layer

Final Decision

  • Choose Cloudflare R2: For global content delivery, cost predictability, and zero egress fees.
  • Choose AWS S3: For AWS-native apps, complex analytics, archiving, or minimal egress scenarios.
  • Hybrid approach: S3 for internal AWS storage, R2 for public-facing assets.

Recent Articles

How I Fixed My CI/CD: Fast, Optimized, and Pro-Level Deploys (Hugo + Cloudflare)

January 14, 2026

We’ve all been there: you push a tiny CSS tweak, and then you sit… and wait… and watch the GitHub Actions logs spin. My Hugo site was taking nearly a minute to deploy. Not …

Deploy Hugo + Tailwind v4 to Cloudflare: Super Fast GitHub Workflow

January 13, 2026

So you want your Hugo site to fly, right? Like, blink-and-it’s-live kind of speed. I got you. We’re gonna set up a GitHub Actions workflow that takes your Hugo code (rocking Tailwind v4), builds it …

Is Tailwind CSS Dying in 2026? Why v4 Might Be the Framework's Final Masterpiece

January 13, 2026

Hope you’re doing good! Honestly, there’s some pretty wild news in the Tailwind world right now. It’s a mix of “the tech is amazing” and “the business is in trouble.” …

Why Hugo is the best Static Site Generators in 2026

January 13, 2026

Thinking about building a site in 2026? Honestly, the “shiny object syndrome” is real with all these frameworks, but Hugo is still the low-key king for anyone who wants a site that just …

Windows 11 vs. The Linux Crew: Why It’s Time to Jump Ship

January 13, 2026

If you’re tired of Windows 11 acting like that one overbearing landlord who enters your apartment without knocking, it’s time we talk about Linux. Switching OSs sounds like a massive headache, but …

Upgrading openSUSE Leap 16.0 to Kernel 6.18 (LTS) via Backports

January 12, 2026

Look, openSUSE Leap 16.0 is awesome. It’s stable, it’s enterprise-grade, and it doesn’t crash. But sometimes, “stable” feels a little too much like “driving your …